- Teams, Talent & Productivity
- Posts
- peer consulting, multiple entry points, and time management
peer consulting, multiple entry points, and time management
Hi there!
Welcome to Teams, Talent & Productivity, brought you by Midnight Labs, the remote and hybrid teams specialists. We help teams become high performing and happy by improving their team dynamics, skills, and ways of working with modern data-driven solutions.
Recent Newsletters:
📰 toxic bosses, range, and how to learn faster
📰 adaptive this, adaptive that, and task switching
📰 funny bones, neural growth and decision making
In this week’s newsletter:
Teams: Unlocking Team Potential with Peer Consulting
Talent: Multiple Entry Points into Learning
Productivity: Task Blocking vs To-Do Lists
Teams
Unlocking Team Potential with Peer Consulting
Peer consulting is a collaborative problem-solving approach where team members come together to help one another tackle challenges and brainstorm solutions. This method leverages the collective intelligence of the group, promoting a culture of shared learning and mutual support. The essence of peer consulting lies in its structured format, where participants rotate roles such as case presenter, advisors, and facilitators, ensuring balanced contributions and diverse perspectives. This approach can be invaluable for teams, as it not only provides innovative solutions but also fosters a strong sense of community and trust. By engaging in peer consulting, teams can uncover new insights, break down silos, and enhance their problem-solving capabilities, ultimately driving better outcomes for their projects and goals.
To implement peer consulting in your team, follow these steps for a structured and effective process:
Form Your Group and Assign Roles: Gather a small group of team members and assign the roles of case presenter, advisors, facilitator, and note-taker. The case presenter describes the challenge they are facing, the advisors provide feedback and suggestions, the facilitator ensures the process stays on track, and the note-taker documents key points.
Describe the Challenge: The case presenter has a set amount of time, typically around 3-5 minutes, to clearly articulate the problem. This should include relevant background information, current obstacles, and any previous attempts to address the issue. Advisors should listen attentively without interrupting.
Reflect Back and Clarify: Advisors take a few minutes to reflect on what they have heard and ask open-ended questions to clarify details. This step helps ensure everyone fully understands the challenge and uncovers any hidden aspects. It is crucial that advisors refrain from giving advice at this stage.
Advisor Discussion: For the main part of the session, advisors discuss the problem among themselves, brainstorming possible solutions and alternative perspectives while the case presenter listens silently. This segment usually lasts around 10-15 minutes. Advisors should explore different angles and share their own experiences related to similar issues.
Summarise and Plan: The case presenter then summarises the insights gained from the advisors’ discussion. They highlight the most valuable suggestions and may ask further questions if needed. Finally, the group debriefs to reflect on the process and discuss how to improve future consultations.
Talent
Multiple Entry Points into Learning

Image Credit: John Lurie
Designing learning experiences with multiple entry points is crucial in accommodating the diverse backgrounds, abilities, and developmental needs of adult learners. The principle that learners progress at almost identical rates, as highlighted by Koedinger et al. (2023), demonstrates that while individuals may start with varying levels of prior knowledge, they can achieve similar levels of mastery given the right conditions. This insight aligns with Immordino-Yang’s principles of development, which emphasise that learning is deeply influenced by social context, emotional engagement, and individual developmental pathways. Providing multiple entry points allows learners to engage with content from a place of strength and relevance, fostering deeper and more sustained learning.
Evidence from educational research supports the efficacy of multiple entry points. For example, studies show that students equipped with diverse prior experiences in a subject can still achieve equivalent outcomes through different learning paths. This adaptability is essential in adult learning environments, where participants bring varied life experiences and professional backgrounds. Immordino-Yang et al. (2019) underscore the importance of scaffolding learning experiences to meet learners at their developmental stage, thus enabling them to leverage their unique cognitive and emotional resources. This approach not only respects individual differences but also promotes a more inclusive and effective learning environment.
To apply these principles in adult learning, educators can implement several practical strategies. First, design flexible learning modules that allow learners to start at different points based on their prior knowledge and experience. Second, incorporate varied instructional methods, such as collaborative projects, hands-on activities, and reflective practices, to cater to different developmental pathways and emotional engagements. Third, create a supportive learning community that encourages peer interaction and mentorship, helping learners to navigate their individual learning paths while benefiting from collective insights and experiences. These strategies ensure that all learners have equitable opportunities to engage with and master the content, enabling a more dynamic and responsive educational experience.
Productivity
Time Blocking vs To-Do Lists

Image Credit: https://todoist.com
When it comes to managing time effectively, two popular strategies often come to mind: time blocking and to-do lists. Both methods aim to enhance productivity and ensure tasks are completed efficiently, but they operate on fundamentally different principles. Time blocking involves dividing your day into specific chunks of time dedicated to particular activities, while to-do lists simply list out tasks to be accomplished, allowing you to tackle them in any order. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach can help you determine which method suits your needs and lifestyle better.
Time blocking offers a structured and disciplined approach to time management. By allocating specific periods for different tasks, you create a detailed schedule that can help you stay focused and reduce procrastination. This method is particularly effective for those who juggle multiple responsibilities or need to dedicate uninterrupted time to deep work. It encourages a sense of urgency and accountability, as each block of time is dedicated to a single task, minimising distractions. However, time blocking can be rigid and may not accommodate unexpected interruptions or changes in priorities, making it less flexible than other methods.
On the other hand, to-do lists provide a simpler and more flexible way to manage tasks. By listing out all the tasks you need to complete, you can easily prioritise and adjust your workload based on urgency and importance. To-do lists are highly adaptable and can be adjusted throughout the day, making them ideal for dynamic environments where priorities frequently shift. They offer the satisfaction of checking off completed tasks, which can be highly motivating. However, to-do lists can sometimes lead to inefficiency if not properly managed, as the lack of structured time allocation might result in less critical tasks taking up valuable time, or important tasks being delayed.
In conclusion, both time blocking and to-do lists have their unique advantages and can be highly effective when used appropriately. Time blocking is great for those who thrive on structure and need to focus on specific tasks without interruptions. To-do lists, meanwhile, are perfect for individuals who require flexibility and prefer a less rigid approach to managing their time. Ultimately, the best method depends on your personal work style, the nature of your tasks, and how you respond to different types of scheduling and organisation. Combining elements of both strategies may also provide a balanced approach, ensuring that you stay organised and productive while remaining adaptable to changes and unforeseen events.
I hope some of this was useful to you, if it was, please feel free to subscribe if you haven’t already so you don’t miss the next one 🙂
Thanks for reading!
Midnight Labs